Mechanism Lab Open the app

Inorganic — asymmetric π-allyl chemistry

Trost asymmetric allylic alkylation

How the Trost asymmetric allylic alkylation works, in 3 steps. Each step shows the structures and the curved arrows that move the electrons.

Open the interactive version

In short. A 3-step mechanism. Typical reagents: Allylic acetate, soft nucleophile (dimethyl malonate, BSA/KOAc), Pd₂(dba)₃ or [Pd(allyl)Cl]₂, chiral bisphosphine ligand L* (Trost ligand). Conditions: CH₂Cl₂ or THF, 25 °C. Bonds formed: C–C (new stereocentre); Pd–allyl (temporary); bonds broken: C–OAc. Stereochemistry: Ligand pocket selects the face and terminus attacked: high ee. Rate and selectivity: Oxidative ionisation or nucleophilic attack can be rate-limiting; fast enantiodetermining attack.

At a glance

ReagentsAllylic acetate, soft nucleophile (dimethyl malonate, BSA/KOAc), Pd₂(dba)₃ or [Pd(allyl)Cl]₂, chiral bisphosphine ligand L* (Trost ligand)
Solvent / conditionsCH₂Cl₂ or THF, 25 °C
Bonds formedC–C (new stereocentre); Pd–allyl (temporary)
Bonds brokenC–OAc
StereochemistryLigand pocket selects the face and terminus attacked: high ee
Rate / selectivityOxidative ionisation or nucleophilic attack can be rate-limiting; fast enantiodetermining attack

Step 1: Ionisation to the π-allyl complex

+oxidativeaddition+Pd(0)L*OOPhPhPd(II)L*PhPhOO1 · IONISATION TO THE Π-ALLYL COMPLEXchiral Pd(0) catalystCATALYST1,3-diphenylallyl acetateSUBSTRATEπ-allyl Pd(II) complexINTERMEDIATEacetateC₂H₃O₂⁻LEAVING GROUPPd(0) attacks the alkene anti to the acetate (SN2′-like); acetate leaves, giving a symmetric allyl–Pd(II).

A chiral bisphosphine ligand on Pd(0) oxidatively adds an allylic substrate, forming the same symmetric π-allyl palladium intermediate as the ordinary Tsuji-Trost reaction — but now held within a well-defined chiral pocket set by the ligand's shape.

Step 2: The chiral pocket picks a face

+attack anti to PdPd(II)L*PhPhOOOOPd(0)L*2 · THE CHIRAL POCKET PICKS A FACEπ-allyl Pd(II) in chiral pocketELECTROPHILEdimethyl malonate anionC₅H₇O₄⁻NUCLEOPHILEPd(0) releasedCATALYSTopen face onlyligand wall blocksthis faceFacial (and terminus) discrimination is set by the ligand shape: the enantiodetermining step.

The chiral ligand environment makes one face (and often one terminus) of the π-allyl system substantially more accessible to an incoming nucleophile than the other — the identical facial-blocking strategy used by every other asymmetric catalyst in this library, just applied to an allyl-metal intermediate instead of a carbonyl or alkene.

Step 3: Enantioenriched allylic product

+OOOOPhPhPd(0)L*3 · ENANTIOENRICHED ALLYLIC PRODUCTallylated malonatesingle enantiomer (high ee)PRODUCTcatalyst regeneratedCATALYSTnew stereocentreNucleophile attached at one terminus only; the other allyl terminus becomes the alkene.

The nucleophile attacks the favored position, releasing an enantioenriched allylic product — this extension of the ordinary Tsuji-Trost mechanism with a chiral ligand is one of the most general, reliable ways to install a new stereocenter at an allylic position.

Abbreviations and terms

L
Ligand. A Lewis-base group (often a phosphine) bound to a metal centre.
Ph
Phenyl. –C₆H₅.
OAc
Acetoxy. –OC(=O)CH₃, an acetate group.
THF
Tetrahydrofuran. Cyclic ether solvent; its oxygen lone pairs solvate Li⁺/Mg²⁺ so organometallics stay dissolved and reactive.
DCM
Dichloromethane. Common non-polar-ish solvent for reactions that need no nucleophilic or protic solvent.
Pd2(dba)3
Tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0). Air-stable source of Pd(0).
dba
Dibenzylideneacetone. Weakly bound alkene ligand on Pd(0).
SN2
Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution. One concerted step with backside attack and inversion; rate = k[RX][Nu].
SN2′
SN2-prime (allylic). Nucleophile attacks the alkene terminus with allylic transposition.
ee
Enantiomeric excess. How much more of one enantiomer than the other is present.

How it compares with related reactions

Trost asymmetric allylic alkylationTsuji-Trost allylic substitutionAssociative ligand substitution at a square-planar Pt(II) complex
ReagentsAllylic acetate, soft nucleophile (dimethyl malonate, BSA/KOAc), Pd₂(dba)₃ or [Pd(allyl)Cl]₂, chiral bisphosphine ligand L* (Trost ligand)allylic acetate/carbonate, soft Nu–H (e.g. dimethyl malonate), base, cat. Pd(PPh₃)₄K₂[PtCl₄] + NH₃ (aq)
ConditionsCH₂Cl₂ or THF, 25 °CTHF, 25–65 °CH₂O, 25 °C
StereochemistryLigand pocket selects the face and terminus attacked: high eeSoft Nu: net retention (inversion at ionisation + inversion at attack)Trigonal-bipyramidal intermediate; retention of geometry
Rate / selectivityOxidative ionisation or nucleophilic attack can be rate-limiting; fast enantiodetermining attackIonisation to the π-allyl complex is usually rate-limitingRate = k₁[Pt] + k₂[Pt][NH₃] (associative; entering-ligand dependent)

Test yourself

Try to answer each question before opening it.

Which reagents and conditions are typical for the Trost asymmetric allylic alkylation?

Allylic acetate, soft nucleophile (dimethyl malonate, BSA/KOAc), Pd₂(dba)₃ or [Pd(allyl)Cl]₂, chiral bisphosphine ligand L* (Trost ligand). Conditions: CH₂Cl₂ or THF, 25 °C.

Which bonds are formed and which are broken?

Formed: C–C (new stereocentre); Pd–allyl (temporary). Broken: C–OAc.

What is the stereochemical outcome?

Ligand pocket selects the face and terminus attacked: high ee

What controls the rate or the selectivity?

Oxidative ionisation or nucleophilic attack can be rate-limiting; fast enantiodetermining attack

Study guides that help with this reaction

Related mechanisms

Step through it interactively, then test yourself in Quiz